- πΊπΈUnited States jastraat
One big disadvantage of the current approach is that the original draft revision message is replaced with the generic 'Bulk operation publish revision' log message and you lose the information about what author originally made the actual edit.
I'd definitely advocate for retaining the information about who authored the changes and why.
- π¨π¦Canada joseph.olstad
agreed, open to reviewing merge request(s) or patch(es) for adjustment(s).
- Merge request !35Issue #3313547: Add setting to retain revision information β (Merged) created by jastraat
- πΊπΈUnited States jastraat
I created an MR with my suggestion.
If this looks like a good approach, I could add the same logic in the unpublishing actions.
-
jastraat β
committed 03ac1865 on 2.0.x
Issue #3313547: Add setting to retain revision information
-
jastraat β
committed 03ac1865 on 2.0.x
- πΊπΈUnited States jastraat
Thanks!
Heads up that I only added the logic to the publish action. We should probably create a followup ticket to add the same logic to the unpublishing action at a minimum.Are you open to that? I can create a followup ticket and PR -
- π¨π¦Canada joseph.olstad
@jastraat , yes please create a followup ticket and PR
Great work!
and Thanks again! - πΊπΈUnited States jastraat
Thanks!
Followup ticket: β¨ Retain last revision info when bulk unpublishing Active