- 🇧🇷Brazil carolpettirossi Campinas - SP
What if we consider the "Entity Status" processor?
For example, if "Entity Status" is enabled, this also affects the Reverse Entity processor - Merge request !2343113288: Update ReverseEntityReference processor to consider Entity Status... → (Open) created by carolpettirossi
- 🇦🇹Austria drunken monkey Vienna, Austria
That is a good suggestion, thanks! It’s also the decision we reached in ✨ Allow excluding unpublished references from index Active .
However, could you maybe check whether the MR there already covers this use case, too? It would be better to just solve this issue once for the whole field extraction code. And we’re missing test coverage in either case. (Otherwise, your MR looks good, thanks!)