- 🇫🇷France dqd London | N.Y.C | Paris | Hamburg | Berlin
While I agree here and hope the maintainer will merge efforts with you, which would embrace the community at its best, so I would like to ask you (the issue reporter @ipwa or any other maintainer of the owlcarousel module) to also follow Drupal policies by being kind and respectful to each other. The original report does not sound very friendly and I would kindly ask you to change the "tone" of your request. Every contribution to the community is appreciated and so is this too.
Apart from that, the Drupal license of D.O. hosted projects allows to fork and merge, so, anybody who wants can merge efforts made here to another project (with credits of course).
And: please do not misuse the issue priority for your needs. Descriptions of the Priority and Status values can be found in the Drupal project issues documentation.
- 🇫🇷France dqd London | N.Y.C | Paris | Hamburg | Berlin
Apart from what I suggested above, there needs also new response from the original reporter here, since I have seen that his claim isn't actually up-to-date no more, because the project page of the owlcarousel module he refers to states:
Replaced by:
Tiny Slider 2So in fact there is actually -NO- actively maintained OwlCarousel module yet on Drupal.org
Also it would be great if both groups of maintainers could agree on one library path and not 2 different paths and library versions to prevent load. This would be one of the advantages on colaborating.
- Status changed to Needs review
9 months ago 11:07am 10 February 2024