- Issue created by @acbramley
- 🇷🇸Serbia bojanz
2.0.x is for bug fixes and small changes only. The next feature release should be 2.1.0, cut from 2.1.x.
The 2.x branch serves as an upstream for feature branches, so 2.2.x would be branched from it. Right now 2.x and 2.1.x should be identical.
- 🇦🇺Australia acbramley
2.0.x is for bug fixes and small changes only
Ok, but 🐛 AddressFieldBuilder::build no longer compatible with diff's CoreFieldBuilder::build Active is an extremely small change and didn't make it in?
- 🇷🇸Serbia bojanz
It shifts the supported Diff branch from 8.x-1.x to 2.0.x, which felt serious enough to leave for a quick 2.1.0 release, which then never materialized.
If you can confirm that the fix still works with diff 8.x-1.x, I can backport.
- 🇦🇺Australia acbramley
@bojanz it's compatible with both branches, adding a return type that doesn't exist on the parent class does not break compatibility.
