- Issue created by @mxh
- 🇩🇪Germany jurgenhaas Gottmadingen
Hmm, I'm not sure yet, if we really need to introduce a new access control here. Other routes are not doing that either, so why should that ECA controlled route have to do it? Shouldn't "both" access checks always come to the same result? So, a menu item should not display if clicking on it would then show a 403, or the other way round, when it's missing, although the user has permission, that also not what we want.
It feels like we need to enhance the existing access check to make sure it works in both contexts, aren't we?