- Issue created by @dcam
- πΊπΈUnited States dcam
I'm willing to do the work if it's decided that the issue should move forward.
- πΊπΈUnited States dcam
Since the schema issue was merged I decided to make an MR. It only took a few minutes of work.
If it's decided to move this forward then I'll make a change record. And the
lifecycle_link
in the info file will have to be updated. Just set the issue back to NW with a note.I wasn't certain if it's better to make an update function to uninstall
fullcalendar_legend
or let site builders do it themselves. I decided to err on the side of not uninstalling something that custom projects might depend on. What are your thoughts?I left the issue version as 3.0.x to get the latest code changes, but per the semver rules this will force the release of 3.1.0.
- π©πͺGermany jurgenhaas Gottmadingen
I think it makes sense to bring the legends into the main module. What we could still do is to provide a views setting whether the extra plugin should be enabled or not. But even if it is always enabled, a block should only be provided when a view with a legend exists, doesn't it?