- Issue created by @a.err
- πΊπΈUnited States mark_fullmer Tucson
I don't think this needs to be marked as critical, since these packages are not part of the distributed Drupal module; they are internal build tools only. Setting priority to "Normal."
- πΊπΈUnited States mark_fullmer Tucson
Reviewing the use of the Gulp build process in this module and the resulting output, I conclude that it does so little that it is more of a liability to keep the build process in the codebase than it is an asset: there is a a fair amount of boilerplate code for SCSS that doesn't exist, and the JS is only very slightly modified. I propose that we work directly from the relatively small JS file in /assets.
If others in the community feel strongly that the build process should continue to be used, it can be reverted -- I'm not strictly opposed to that, but I will proceed to do the removal here in the absence of other strong opinions. Thanks!
-
mark_fullmer β
committed ca0bb290 on 2.x
Issue #3498513: Outdated local tooling package-lock.json -- Trivy Scan...
-
mark_fullmer β
committed ca0bb290 on 2.x