Support for Field Permissions module?

Created on 24 October 2024, 28 days ago

Problem/Motivation

May be asking a bit here, I am building a "certification application" that requires references. I made a Reference content type that implements Field Permissions, to hide some fields from the Applicant role.

Outside references, ideally will not need a login, access the Reference node from an email link, and make some edits.

But, because of the Field Permission module, I cannot get node_authlink to work. I assume it somehow makes the anonymous user an authenticated role?

✨ Feature request

Status

Active

Version

2.0

Component

Code

Created by

🇺🇸United States goose2000

Live updates comments and jobs are added and updated live.

Comments & Activities

Issue created by @goose2000
Comment 28 days ago →
🇺🇸United States goose2000
Ok, take this back, it did work with Field Permissions module. I was tricked when I used the NodeAuth link initially, every things was working, I got curious and tried to remove the key part:

?authkey=3dea2fadba170df0ff28a386b86a9394a5093e49e1b72ee731a214b4454dd59b

And it would still let me edit, but later tested, in a different browser, and I got access denied - great !

So I concluded I was in some sort of edit session that was initiated by the original node_auth link.

contrib.social Blog FAQ Discussions

Production build 0.71.5 2024