- Issue created by @smccabe
- 🇨🇦Canada smccabe
Hmm.. it looks like use cases that already start with underscores need to be supported and items need to be both encoded and decoded
123 -> _123 -> 123
_123 -> _123 -> _123So using just a simple underscore it's impossible to determine if it was their already or not. Would it make the most sense to use something like `num_` or even `coreSchemaNumber_`?
- 🇨🇭Switzerland dulnan
Yeah exactly, it's quite tricky to fix. I guess prefixing it with "coreSchemaNumber_" would be the safest (since its very unlikely to clash with anything else). But it's quite verbose. I think "GQL_ENUM_" could also work, it's a bit shorter. What do you think?