- Issue created by @scott_euser
- @scott_euser opened merge request.
- Status changed to Needs reviewover 1 year ago 8:07am 12 April 2024
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom scott_euserOkay this solves it in my testing. The old Group code I took from the patches when that functionality was originally created, but it was far too difficult to read and follow the logic. This now is at least a bit more readable without changing the structure and allowed me to find duplicates based on the text, yet still keep the references unique for back-links. Let's see if the tests flag any regressions, otherwise I'll get a test added for this. 
- Status changed to Needs workover 1 year ago 9:50am 12 April 2024
- 
            
              scott_euser →
             committed 3690ca2f on 4.0.x
Issue #3440429: Duplicate footnotes when using footnote summary in... 
 
- 
            
              scott_euser →
             committed 3690ca2f on 4.0.x
- Issue was unassigned.
- Status changed to Fixedover 1 year ago 8:49pm 16 April 2024
- Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.