What are the differences between WissKI RDF via SPARQL1.1 Adapter with Pathbuilder and WissKI SPARQL1.1 Adapter with Pathbuilder??

Created on 7 April 2024, 9 months ago
Updated 8 April 2024, 9 months ago

From the name, the former supports RDF. However, the latter ususally supports OWL (i.e. CIDOC-CRM), which is based on RDF. So I don't know the differences and applying situations.

BTW:
Does WissKI pathbuilder support those adapters without "with Pathbuilder"? In other word, I think WissKI pathbuilder depends on the integrety of inheritances in the ontology such as CIDOC-CRM, am I right?

💬 Support request
Status

Active

Version

3.0

Component

Documentation

Created by

🇨🇳China fishfree

Live updates comments and jobs are added and updated live.
Sign in to follow issues

Comments & Activities

  • Issue created by @fishfree
  • 🇩🇪Germany Knurg

    yes, WissKI RDF via SPARQL1.1 Adapter is for RDF only and WissKI SPARQL1.1 Adapter with Pathbuilder is for OWL 1 only. The funny thing is that for us the typical usecase is OWL and not RDF and therefore we don't interpret rdf properties etc. Of course OWL is based on RDF, but the OWL-Adapter searches for owl:objectProperty etc. in the triple store and not for rdf:property. So the only real difference is what the adapters look for.

    WissKI does a semantical mapping with the pathbuilder and to alter the pathbuilder in any way you will need an ontology, yes. But it may be any kind of rdf/owl ontology. However we have limitations to the features an ontology provides.... :)

Production build 0.71.5 2024