Update via drush deletes text content from summary

Thanks for spotting this! This should sort it, but can you confirm please?

I am unsure if the summary should also be parsed for existing footnotes - I am correct that it should not be? Ie, summaries are plain text and without footnotes right?

I called the update script from this branch and the summary texts were retained.

A summary can also contain html. It always has the same format as the longtext. But in my opinion the use of footnotes in a summary would be extremely unusual.

Thanks for testing! Actually it may not be completely unusual as I noted another issue on 3x branch described duplicate footnotes when citations were in the summary in 🐛 Footnotes repeating Needs work so I figured I might as well refactor to cover that as well. Look okay to you?

Looks ok for me.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.