- Issue created by @kurttrowbridge
- last update
9 months ago 62 pass - Status changed to Needs review
9 months ago 12:19am 28 February 2024
I recently worked with a statewide legal aid organization who wanted to implement LegalService metadata based on recommendations within the legal aid community, particularly following the advice of Stanford's Legal Design Lab. Additional clients I work with have since requested the same functionality, and while they are using the Stanford-created Legal Schema.org markup generator to prepare their metadata, it would be preferable to handle that through the Metatag ecosystem. Anecdotally, the legal aid community has built a fairly strong Drupal following.
The merge request provides a LegalService integration, with several fields prepared (the fields requested by the original client; I'm not sure if it needs to be all-encompassing to include what's listed in the Schema.org list, but it doesn't look like other submodules are set up in that way). Of note, the knowsAbout field has been labeled as LIST codes, explicitly specifying that those should contain URLs from the Legal Issues Taxonomy.
Additional reviews of the MR would be much appreciated! I also wanted to note that I've seen some back-and-forth discussion of whether or not these should remain as part of Schema.org Metatag or broken out into their own submodules; I think the consensus was that we should continue to submit them here, but let me know if I've misunderstood that.
If merged, please also credit wilsonsp → at Michigan Legal Help.
Thank you!
Needs review
3.0
Code