Advice on Schema Structure for Rankings

Created on 18 August 2023, over 1 year ago

Hi! Need your kind advice please. I been trying for years to get to no 1 google ranking for the keyword 'logline examples'.

https://www.google.com/search?q=logline+examples

My Article

https://www.filmdaily.tv/logline/logline-examples

  • 3000 word article
  • lots of backlinks
  • social signals

Competitor

This is what baffles me. There are 3 results ahead of me, short articles without any strong content, but they rank first.

In my research it is an agency that does the schema for all 3 top results (universities .edu) and they definitely know what they doing.

https://online.pointpark.edu/screenwriting/loglines/

What I think possibly the secret is that the following schema structure is their waterfall in one module:

article
- is part of webpage
- is part of website
-- publisher
-- potential action {search_term_string}
-- breadcrumb
-- potential action (read action)
author
mainentityofpage (webpage)
-- part of website
-- publisher (organization)
-- potential action {search_term_string}
-- breadcrumb
-- potential action (read action)
publisher
-- same as

Then a secondary element called 'hcard'.

Please, what do you think the magic element is here, how are they able to rank as no 1 with so little content?

Could it be the images, potential action, or just the way it is structured?
What's up with the (#) after the links?

Most appreciate your thoughts 🌿

💬 Support request
Status

Active

Version

2.5

Component

Miscellaneous

Created by

🇫🇷France liliplanet Cannes

Live updates comments and jobs are added and updated live.
Sign in to follow issues

Comments & Activities

Production build 0.71.5 2024