Naming suggesting: change "core" to "classic"

Thanks for this suggestion. I'm not sure whether that will help, but could be. However this would also mean an effort in renaming the modeller class (currently named as Core) plus chaning the modeller's routing URL. So this would be a major change with extra efforts required. I currently don't have the resources for such a change.

For a short term band-aid, I have added a description block on the project page to inform readers about what this module is about and what is more recommended (including a link to the bpmn_io module). Hope that helps a bit. But seriously, users should read project page descriptions and readme files. Otherwise how should they learn what it's about?

Thanks a lot for considering this.

However this would also mean an effort in renaming the modeller class (currently named as Core) plus chaning the modeller's routing URL.

Well, maybe not necessary to go that far. I thought it would be sufficient to only change the user facing components, especially the title/name on the project page and subsequently the links in other sources that list eca_cm as one of the available modellers.

For a short term band-aid, I have added a description block on the project page

This is much appreciated.

But seriously, users should read project page descriptions and readme files.

:LOL: ... :LOL:

So we just change name and description of the module?

That would certainly do, from my POV.

Created an MR that contains the naming change. If this is fixed, I'll change the project page contents accordingly.

This looks great, thanks for taking your time doing this.

Great, thanks for the quick feedback.

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.