- Issue created by @erdm
- 🇺🇸United States tr Cascadia
Sure, that could be useful. Can you submit a patch?
I was involved in that Flag issue three years ago, and it's still open. If you would like to get a similar feature into Voting API then it will require a patch, test cases, and user feedback reported here in this issue.
Because flood control is something that is useful in many places, and because very few contributed module implement flood control, I find it more useful in general to use Rules to write the workflow processes on a site. Detecting floods and doing something about them (even if it's just logging) is a workflow issue that affects the site as a whole, not just individual modules.
- Assigned to RohitRawat676
- Issue was unassigned.
- Status changed to Needs review
about 1 year ago 3:35am 15 November 2023 - last update
about 1 year ago 10 pass - Status changed to Active
about 1 year ago 4:37am 15 November 2023 - 🇺🇸United States tr Cascadia
What does your patch have to do with flood control? Nothing. Why did you post it here?
- 🇳🇱Netherlands eelkeblok Netherlands 🇳🇱
Probably an hones mistake. Funny. We've rebuilt the feature that triggered the flag issue years ago based on voting API and I came looking for a similar feature. You are right that that issue needs TLC. It's also an interesting insight that it might be more about what you do with the action than anything else. Is it, strictly speaking, a problem if someone/something triggers many votes?