- Issue created by @jurgenhaas
- @jurgenhaas opened merge request.
- Status changed to Needs review
over 1 year ago 8:28am 7 April 2023 - 🇩🇪Germany mxh Offenburg
Nice, thanks for providing this. I just tested this locally, and works.
I'm not sure whether the current UI is what's expected to be good UX. That's a subjective thing I guess, for me this looks unfamiliar. Because the field is just marked red with a text "Must not be empty.", which may look like the user did something wrong (but didn't).
- 🇩🇪Germany jurgenhaas Gottmadingen
Yes, the UX is debatable. But it's not an ECA issue. ECA just provides the information which fields are required. What the modeller is doing with that information is out of scope. In case of the bpmn.io modeller, this is addressed in 📌 Required form field should be marked as mandatory Postponed: needs info .
Looks like this is then RTBC and I wonder if it needs to be back ported?
- Status changed to RTBC
over 1 year ago 12:29pm 7 April 2023 - 🇩🇪Germany mxh Offenburg
Yes, could be back ported if you want. As this works, setting RTBC. I'm a bit concerned that people will find this confusing, but we could see how the feedback is (if any).
-
jurgenhaas →
committed 289a0c08 on 1.2.x
Issue #3352864: Define required constraint for BPMN based modellers
-
jurgenhaas →
committed 289a0c08 on 1.2.x
-
jurgenhaas →
committed 6ba39a2c on 1.1.x
Issue #3352864: Define required constraint for BPMN based modellers
-
jurgenhaas →
committed 6ba39a2c on 1.1.x
- Status changed to Fixed
over 1 year ago 9:49am 27 April 2023 Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.