- πΊπΈUnited States douggreen Winchester, VA
This function begins with an "_" which means that it is meant to be private.
I suggest that you either:
(a) add a service to expose it so that we aren't using a private function, or
(b) rename the function here and everywhere it's used.We need the core maintainer to weigh in on what they'd prefer.
- @juanolalla opened merge request.
- πͺπΈSpain juanolalla
Opened a new merge request targeting 2.0.x branch
- πΊπΈUnited States douggreen Winchester, VA
You can ignore my comment about the private function. I was confused. I thought from the description that someone wanted to use this function with other modules, and make it more flexible at the same time. If the purpose of this change is to just make _allowed_formats_field_types more flexible with configuration, then this is great!